Place of publication:
Sp. pl. ed. 2, 2:1101. 1763
Comment:
treated by some as an illegitimate, superfluous name for C. aurantium var. grandis L. (1753), but L. (1763) did not mention the 1753 name and in 1763 the earlier1753 varietal name remained untypified, so this does not meet the conditions of Melbourne ICN Art. 52.2 for a superfluous name