Place of publication:
Dis. Sobre Inst. Jard. Prov. Brazil 32. 1810
Comment:
according to Taxon 54:527-528. 2005 (but not 55:799. 2006), a rejected name (nomen utique rejiciendum) under Melbourne ICN Art. 56 that is unavailable for use, but not listed in App. V and should likely be viewed as not validly published (p. 528), although the General Committee could not reach agreement on this conslusion